News 28 : Chine, OGM, analyse dur 15 ans.

Insolites, drôles ou étonnantes, voici les news scientifiques sélectionnées régulièrement par l'ami Bull. Mais vous pouvez vous aussi y poster vos infos. (attention à la rigueur scientifique)

Modérateurs : Eric, jerome, Travis, Charlotte, marie.m, Magda Dorner, Bull

Répondre
Avatar du membre
Bull
Messages : 1604
Enregistré le : mar. juil. 18, 2006 6:02 pm

News 28 : Chine, OGM, analyse dur 15 ans.

Message par Bull » lun. sept. 22, 2008 3:22 pm

Je vous mets l'abstract et la fin de la discussion qui vient de sortir dans Science et qui montre :
-L'effet positif d'un cotton trangénique non seulement sur le cotton mais aussi sur d'autres espèces végétales.
Si vous avez des critiques sur l'étude elle-même, OK.
Si c'est sur les OGM en générale, Cf. la discussion en cours ici.
Science. 2008 Sep 19;321(5896):1676-8.


Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in china in areas with bt toxin-containing cotton.

Wu KM, Lu YH, Feng HQ, Jiang YY, Zhao JZ.

State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.


Transgenic cotton that has been engineered to produce insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and so to resist the pest cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) has been widely planted in Asia. Analysis of the population dynamics of H. armigera from 1992 to 2007 in China indicated that a marked decrease in regional outbreaks of this pest in multiple crops was associated with the planting of Bt cotton. The study area included six provinces in northern China with an annual total of 3 million hectares of cotton and 22 million hectares of other crops (corn, peanuts, soybeans, and vegetables) grown by more than 10 million resource-poor farmers. Our data suggest that Bt cotton not only controls H. armigera on transgenic cotton designed to resist this pest but also may reduce its presence on other host crops and may decrease the need for insecticide sprays in general.

Fin de la discussion :
However, a major challenge for planting Bt cotton for pest control is the potential for insects to evolve resistance to Bt. Continuous monoculture of varieties that express the same Bt toxin could select for resistance, particularly when the amount of Bt toxin decreases as the plants age (9, 10). A promising resistance management strategy entails the use of plants with a high dose of toxin in combination with the maintenance of "refuge" crops that encourage proliferation of Bt-susceptible insects within the pest population (11–13). To this end, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires that each cotton farm set aside some land for cotton that does not produce Bt if farmers plant transgenic Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac toxic protein (14–16). Although successful in the United States (17), this strategy is difficult to implement in China because of the challenges associated with educating and monitoring millions of small farmers. In China, a multiple cropping system consisting of soybeans, peanuts, corn, and vegetables is common. These crops also serve as hosts for H. armigera, and, because they do not express Bt toxin, they serve as refuges for nonresistant insects (10). Because cotton is not the only host crop, Bt cotton comprises about 10% of the major host crops in any province or throughout northern China. This accidental approach to refuge management appears to have, so far, warded off the evolution of resistance (10). Nevertheless, as a result of decreased spraying of broad-spectrum pesticides for controlling cotton bollworm in Bt cotton fields, mirids have recently become key pests of cotton in China (18, 19). Therefore, despite its value, Bt cotton should be considered only one component in the overall management of insect pests in the diversified cropping systems common throughout China.

Avatar du membre
Eons
Messages : 6338
Enregistré le : sam. févr. 17, 2007 6:49 pm
Localisation : Le cœur de Flandre
Contact :

Message par Eons » lun. sept. 22, 2008 5:33 pm

En français, "coton" ne prend qu'un "t". :wink:
Les beaux livres, c’est aussi par ici : www.eons.fr

Bouse Bleuâtre

Message par Bouse Bleuâtre » lun. sept. 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Oui, mais il faut prendre en compte le fait que Bull habite désormais à Bostton.

Avatar du membre
Jean
Messages : 546
Enregistré le : dim. janv. 22, 2006 4:57 pm
Localisation : Yvelines
Contact :

Message par Jean » lun. sept. 22, 2008 7:15 pm

C'est fort intéressant.
D'une part, l'étude montre que (à court terme au moins) on peut agir notablement sur les nuisances avec les OGM - imaginez ce qu'on pourrait faire en supprimant les moustiques du Canada...
Mais elle est plus circonspecte à long terme. Ce qui est honnête et pas si répandu que cela dans ce genre d'étude.
C'est moins grave que si c'était pire ! (S.A.)

justine
Messages : 126
Enregistré le : lun. nov. 06, 2006 8:32 pm

Re: News 28 : Chine, OGM, analyse dur 15 ans.

Message par justine » lun. sept. 22, 2008 7:55 pm

Très intéressant cet article!
Bull a écrit :but also may reduce its presence on other host crops

C'est expliqué comment cette réduction ?

Avatar du membre
Bull
Messages : 1604
Enregistré le : mar. juil. 18, 2006 6:02 pm

Message par Bull » lun. sept. 22, 2008 9:44 pm

Au niveau des données brutes cela concerne :
Larval densities of H. armigera from 1997 to 2006 on corn, peanuts, soybeans, and vegetables in northern China A) Relation between larval density of the second generation () and planting year of Bt cotton. Linear model of larval density (black line), y = 480,293.95 – 239.28x, F = 16.50, df = 1,466, P = 0.0001, R2 = 0.03. (B) Relation between larval density of the third generation () and planting year of Bt cotton. Linear model of larval density (black line), y = 551,611.74 – 274.83x, F = 21.45, df = 1,462, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.04. Data are means ± SEM. Values in parentheses are the numbers of sampling sites for each year.
Au niveau de l'explication avancée par les auteurs :

Our results suggest that Bt cotton led to reduced populations of H. armigera not only on cotton but also on other host crops. This may be because cotton usually is the main host for the moths of the first generation to lay eggs and acts as the source of the subsequent generations on other host crops (6). Bt cotton kills most of the larvae of the second generation and, accordingly, works as a dead-end trap crop for H. armigera population. Interest in trap cropping, a promising agroecological approach for insect pest control, has increased considerably for modern agriculture (7, 8 ), but few trap crops were used on such a large scale as that of Bt cotton in northern China, which shows that Bt crop can have a great advantage to expand the traditional view of a trap crop. This dependence on Bt cotton might also contribute to a reduction in both occurrence of H. armigera and the need for insecticide sprays in non-Bt host crops such as corn, soybeans, peanuts, and vegetables.

Répondre

Retourner vers « Section 1 : Des nouvelles des sciences »